Home     |     Reviews      |       Forum         |      Nuggets        |      Events       |       Links    


The Olde Foruhms of Jabewtoo
You have been granted an audience with Jabootu...
The Olde Foruhms of Jabewtoo
Home | Profile | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Jabootu's Threads
 Jabootubbs - Enter Here!
 The Return of Roger Ebert
 Forum Locked  Topic Locked
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

hbrennan
Holy Cardinal and Five Star General of the Righteous Knighthood of Jabootu

Philippines
1455 Posts

Posted - 04/01/2008 :  7:26:51 PM  Show Profile  Visit hbrennan's Homepage
http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=307711>1=7701

I don't always agree with him (to say the least) - but his talent is formidable. I wish him well and look forward to seeing him back in the saddle...

"...yet it hadn't destroyed his brain."
re: Charles "The Butcher" Benton (1956)

http://www.henrybrennan.com/

EFH
Minister of the Sacraments of Jabootu

27 Posts

Posted - 04/01/2008 :  10:13:11 PM  Show Profile
I can never figure the man out. At one moment he is a genius understanding everything that is to know about movie. Then he switches off. Very confusing. His list of worse films of all time contains both settings. Granted it is more of the former, but still.
Go to Top of Page

RossM
Holy Cardinal and Five Star General of the Righteous Knighthood of Jabootu

USA
427 Posts

Posted - 04/01/2008 :  10:21:33 PM  Show Profile
I always enjoy Roger's reviews. Often they are plain bizarre but they are always intelligent and insightful even when totally wrongheaded.
Go to Top of Page

Neville
Holy Cardinal and Five Star General of the Righteous Knighthood of Jabootu

Spain
1590 Posts

Posted - 04/02/2008 :  03:21:23 AM  Show Profile
I also like the guy. I rarely agree with his "marks", and I think the idea of giving marks to movies is very innacurate, but it's nice to see a fella that tries both to give some insight on everyday movies and keeps things simple enough so anybody can follow him.

I have a college degree, and despite this often I have trouble figuring out some film reviewers. Even if they liked the film or not.

Basically, when I read a review on a movie what I want to know it's what kind of film it wants to be, and if it succeeds. Not many reviewers bother to answer that.
Go to Top of Page

Ken HPoJ
Supreme Potentate

USA
1530 Posts

Posted - 04/02/2008 :  07:22:54 AM  Show Profile  Visit Ken HPoJ's Homepage
I agree with EFH (and as a Chicagoland guy, I've been tracking Ebert a lot longer than most). There are times when he is literally perhaps the best film writer in the country, expressing cleanly and clearly and entertainingly deep insights into great films. Then one of his wires gets tripped (certain chicks he finds hot; politics) and all his critical acumen flies out that window.

Still, his struggle with all his medical problems has been inspiring. Here's hoping he's completely back on his feet soon.

PEGGY: I don't see how having a girl on the team would ruin it. Did a woman judge ruin the Supreme Court?
HANK: Yes, and that woman's name was Earl Warren.

--King of the Hill
Go to Top of Page

Sardu
Holy Cardinal and Five Star General of the Righteous Knighthood of Jabootu

1126 Posts

Posted - 04/02/2008 :  09:12:59 AM  Show Profile
I always find him fun to read- AFTER I see a movie. I like finding out how his take compared to mine because, as people have pointed out, there's no way to tell how the heck he'll feel about a movie which makes his opinions useless to me as far as actually deciding to see a film. Also, it protects against the major spoiler bombs he drops from time to time. Ebert's reviews are always a great read, positive or negative.

"Meeting you makes me want to be a real noodle cook"
--Tampopo
Go to Top of Page

Ken HPoJ
Supreme Potentate

USA
1530 Posts

Posted - 04/02/2008 :  09:15:37 AM  Show Profile  Visit Ken HPoJ's Homepage
I never read a review before seeing a movie, exactly for that reason: I don't want to know what's going to happen before hand. Ebert, it must be said, hasn't exactly avoided blowing important plot details, especially when he doesn't particularly like a movie. (Which shouldn't have anything to do with it.) Like you, I'd rather read a review after seeing a film.

PEGGY: I don't see how having a girl on the team would ruin it. Did a woman judge ruin the Supreme Court?
HANK: Yes, and that woman's name was Earl Warren.

--King of the Hill
Go to Top of Page

Ericb
Holy Cardinal and Five Star General of the Righteous Knighthood of Jabootu

USA
648 Posts

Posted - 04/02/2008 :  09:48:41 AM  Show Profile
I remember Ebert getting pissed at Siskel when Sickel outed the twist of The Crying Game on their show.

"I reserve the right to look as well as be boring." - Robert Fripp
Go to Top of Page

Ken HPoJ
Supreme Potentate

USA
1530 Posts

Posted - 04/02/2008 :  09:55:52 AM  Show Profile  Visit Ken HPoJ's Homepage
Well, yeah, that would be a biggie. Like I said, though, Ebert's not exactly spotless on that topic either. In fact, he blows stuff like crazy. I don't like other people assuming they know what won't blow a movie for me.

PEGGY: I don't see how having a girl on the team would ruin it. Did a woman judge ruin the Supreme Court?
HANK: Yes, and that woman's name was Earl Warren.

--King of the Hill
Go to Top of Page

zombiewhacker
Holy Cardinal and Five Star General of the Righteous Knighthood of Jabootu

USA
1475 Posts

Posted - 04/02/2008 :  12:45:37 PM  Show Profile
The reason why film critics blow plot twists and spoilers has to do with the need for adulation. It's not enough for a viewer to say, "What a great plot twist: Keyser Soze turns out to be Norman Bates' sled!" The Eberts of the world want to you say: "Boy, Roger was right, what a great plot twist: Keyser Soze... yada yada." Then the critic will get added credit for being so smart, clever, and perceptive.
Go to Top of Page

twitterpate
Holy Cardinal and Five Star General of the Righteous Knighthood of Jabootu

Canada
1026 Posts

Posted - 04/05/2008 :  3:07:09 PM  Show Profile
I think that's a little unfair. I think Ebert tries to take a critical, or rather scholarly, approach to his reviews, looking at the meaning of the work as a whole. Unfortunately, that way of describing a movie doesn't always work when you are also trying to conceal plot twists from an audience who have little familiarity with the work in question. It would be hard, for example, to write a critical review of the novel Moby Dick without discussing the signficance of Ahab's death (and the death of all but one of the crew) at the end.

Er, I hope I didn't spoil things for anyone....
Go to Top of Page

hbrennan
Holy Cardinal and Five Star General of the Righteous Knighthood of Jabootu

Philippines
1455 Posts

Posted - 04/05/2008 :  3:17:06 PM  Show Profile  Visit hbrennan's Homepage
Thanks, twitterpate. Next, you'll be telling me the identity of "Rosebud", I guess.

"...yet it hadn't destroyed his brain."
re: Charles "The Butcher" Benton (1956)

http://www.henrybrennan.com/
Go to Top of Page

Sardu
Holy Cardinal and Five Star General of the Righteous Knighthood of Jabootu

1126 Posts

Posted - 04/05/2008 :  3:18:24 PM  Show Profile
Ebert's spoilers are in fact generally necessary and relevant to his reviews. No problem there. My gripe is that he tends to have a real problem (or has in the past at any rate) warning you that they're coming up. I don't think he can bring himself to suggest that you might want to skip part of the review...

"Meeting you makes me want to be a real noodle cook"
--Tampopo
Go to Top of Page

kennyblankenchip
Altar Boy of Jabootu

USA
9 Posts

Posted - 04/10/2008 :  11:13:46 AM  Show Profile
I am also glad to see Ebert back in the saddle as it were. i may not always agree with his picks but he does seem to have talent in knowing how movies are made.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 Forum Locked  Topic Locked
Jump To:
The Olde Foruhms of Jabewtoo © 1999-2014 Jabootu. Don't Mess With Jabootu! Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000